On Fri, 02 May 2008 18:33:07 +0200
Gunnar Hjalmarsson <noreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Levente Kovacs wrote:
> > J. Peng wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Levente Kovacs
> >> <leventelist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> I'd like to write a code shared among several simple scripts, as
> >>> a NON-OO module, ...
>
> <snip>
>
> >> #########################
> >> # the third way
> >> #########################
> >> Both the first way and the second way are not good.Because your
> >> config file is large,the former ways have im****ted all those large
> >> content into your main script.If your main script is run under
> >> cgi/modperl which is generally multi-process,your memory could be
> >> eated quickly.So the best way is to create an object then
> >> multi-process can share the object if this object was not changed
> >> later,since object is only located in its own namespace.
> >
> > Thanks for your answer, approach #3 works good. That is what I
> > wanted.
>
> A slightly surprising response, considering that you in the original
> post said that you would like to write a non-OO module.
Yes, but without it I could not figure out how to achieve it. I think it
is
very complicated comparing to C, C++. The more language I learn, the more
I
think C(++) is the most flexible language.
Thanks,
Levente
--
Levente Kovacs <leventelist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
