In article <BCAC772F-2402-4AD4-BC87-85407A1B77B8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Nathan
Torkington <gnat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 13/05/2006, at 2:17 AM, Peter Scott wrote:
> > I don't know how long it's been up, but I just noticed Google
> > Trends. See
> > http://www.google.com/trends?q=perl
> For a bad time, compare Perl to its peers: <http://www.google.com/
> trends?q=perl+programming%2Cpython+programming%2Cruby
> +programming&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all>
I'm not so sure these trends are anything to care about. They're
relative to the total volume of Google searches, so even though the
trend is realatively downward, I expect that the total Google search
volume is trending up, and I would also expect that since hardly anyone
in the world is a computer ****grammer, the relative percentages of
computer-ish terms trend downwards if their absolute numbers stayed the
same. Not only that, there's no scale. If we're talking fractions of a
percent, that's a lot different than seeing much larger jumps. Without
more information about overall trends, these numbers don't mean much
because there is no context.
Still, Ruby seems to be doing really well. :)
Why worry about other languages though? It's not like Rolls Royce is
going to panic because people are buying more Yugos. :)
|
