Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Perl Advocacy > Re: Critique of...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 11 Topic 23 of 91
Post > Topic >>

Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading

by shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shlomi Fish) Oct 20, 2004 at 08:54 PM

On Monday 18 October 2004 01:21, Adam Turoff wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 02:22:29PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > I wrote a critique of where Perl 6 is heading. It was published in
> > Freshmeat:
> >
> > http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/1339/
>
> Where you say, in part:
>
> 	Why Perl 6 is Bad?
>
> 	No one Understands Perl 6
>
> 	Having read this title, you are probably thinking to yourself: "So
> 	you don't understand Perl 6. What makes you think everyone else
> 	doesn't? How do you justify this inductive thinking?" Let me tell
> 	you a little story:
>
> 	One day, I met with a good friend of mine (whom I highly appreciate
> 	both as a person and as a software engineer), and I asked him if he
> 	reads the Apocalypses. He said he does, but that he doesn't
> 	understand them. This eventually made me realize that I also read
> 	them, and also did not understand many things. And neither he nor I
> 	are particularly stupid people. And here's an interesting quote from
> 	the famous Weblog "Joel on Software": "Whenever somebody gives you a
> 	spec for some new technology, if you can't understand the spec,
> 	don't worry too much. Nobody else is going to understand it, either,
> 	and it's probably not going to be im****tant." (Read more at the link).
>
> If you can say this with a straight face, then you must not have
> listened to the rationale for Perl6, nor heard the four years' worth of
> reiteration of that rationale.
>
> No, no one knows how to program in Perl 6.  And that will continue to be
> the case for another few years.  And, no, this is not a problem.  

You are mistaking two things. When I said no-one understands Perl 6, I
meant 
that no-one understands the subset of Perl 6 that was presented by Larry
Wall 
in the Apocalypses, and was considered a _final subset_ of the Perl 6 
functionality. I wasn't refering to the language as a whole as it is yet 
unkown.

Regards,

	Shlomi Fish

-- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish      shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.shlomifish.org/

Knuth is not God! It took him two days to build the Roman Empire.
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-16 14:22:29 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
merlyn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-10-16 22:49:57 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-17 12:59:40 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
ziggy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-10-17 19:21:30 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-20 20:54:02 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
peter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-10-18 03:11:44 
RE: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
pressio@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-18 18:28:32 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-20 21:06:44 
RE: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
tom@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2004-10-24 21:40:52 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (A  2004-11-07 15:48:15 
RE: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
pressio@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-16 00:18:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 0:50:11 CDT 2008.