Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Perl Advocacy > Re: Critique of...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 11 Topic 23 of 91
Post > Topic >>

Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading

by shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shlomi Fish) Oct 17, 2004 at 12:59 PM

On Sunday 17 October 2004 07:49, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> >>>>> "Shlomi" == Shlomi Fish <shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> Shlomi> The history of this article is a bit eventful. What I can say
> Shlomi> is that I sent it to Freshmeat.net because I saw that my
> Shlomi> editor at O'ReillyNet was not responsive. However, after it
> Shlomi> was sent, I received some more commentary from him, which I
> Shlomi> did not respond to or integrate yet. The Freshmeat article
> Shlomi> eventually was edited and published, afterwards without this
> Shlomi> commentary, because its editor invested time in publi****ng
> Shlomi> it. It is still mostly pertinent.
>
> You are apparently not taking seriously anything that is being said
> that is critical of you.  

Why do you think so?

> Your story above also argues for that.  In 
> fact, it says that Freshmeat is willing to publish any random
> half-thought-through opinion, which means that it's about as worthless
> as a blog. I'd admire that O'ReillyNet failed to accept your dribble 
> as requested.

That's not quite accurate. I sent the article to the O'Reilly Net editor a
few 
times, in which he passed critique on it. The last time I sent it to him,
I 
waited for quite a long time, and so believed I won't get an answer. 
Throughout the all time, I wasn't sure that the article will be published 
there and the editor's purpose was to make sure the article was good
enough.

After I waited for a while, I sent it to the Freshmeat editor. Then, a few

days since, I received a reply from the O'Reilly Net editor with extra 
critique of the article. I did not have a chance to respond to it, because
I 
was busy in other things. A few days afterwards, I received a notice from
the 
Freshmeat editor that he edited the article, and was about to publish it.
So 
it had to be published there.

Regards,

	Shlomi Fish
-- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish      shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.shlomifish.org/

Knuth is not God! It took him two days to build the Roman Empire.
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-16 14:22:29 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
merlyn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-10-16 22:49:57 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-17 12:59:40 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
ziggy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-10-17 19:21:30 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-20 20:54:02 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
peter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-10-18 03:11:44 
RE: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
pressio@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-18 18:28:32 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
shlomif@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-20 21:06:44 
RE: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
tom@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2004-10-24 21:40:52 
Re: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (A  2004-11-07 15:48:15 
RE: Critique of Where Perl 6 is Heading
pressio@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-16 00:18:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 6:46:27 CDT 2008.