Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Perl Advocacy > Re: major advoc...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 11 Topic 12 of 95
Post > Topic >>

Re: major advocacy help needed

by gabor@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gabor Szabo) Apr 6, 2004 at 10:25 AM

> Considering that maybe your boss, being a Senior VP, isn't very sensible
to the language's specs, I'd try a more high level approach:
.... and the VP will respond something like this:

>
> - Perl is an Open Source language with world wide sup****t of a large
enthusiastic community independent from 3rd party cor****ate interests
It does not have a "father". What if those people lose interest. What if
we have a problem and those kids are not interested in fixing it.
We cannot afford to invest in something so risky.

> - A lot has been done through the years to enrich the language (CPAN)
I can buy the same things for Java.
Where can I buy sup****t for those libraries on CPAN ?
What about copyright issues ? I'll need to ask our lawyer ($200/hour) for
every library we download.

> - It's no spring chicken.  Perl has been around for many years, and it's
used because it's good, not because someone sold it as va****ware very well
Perl is an old langugage, does it have objects anyway ?

> - Being also free, in case your boss changes his mind later, there is no
risk of regretting some big licenses investment
So you say it might not fit ? I want to decide on our language of choice
NOW ! And yes, BTW what you pay is what you get.

> - Perl is quite lightweight and tipycally does not need big hardware or
expensive application servers to run, like Java does
Hardware is cheap, it is not relevant. Does Perl have such a wide choice
of Application Servers ?

> - If finding Java programmers is easier, then finding bad Java
programmers also is. Quality and quantity differ.
Perl scripters can't even read each others code.

> - A bad OO Java architecture has tipycally tragic performance problems
and is hard to reengineer. A poorly implemented Perl architecture is more
easily tuned and fixed
Perl is an interpreted scripting languge. It is known to be slow.

> - EAR deployment consumes too much development time
Installing 50 modules from CPAN is a nightmare.

> - Perl also runs everywhere
Does it run on mobile phones and on PDAs ?

>
> Of course there are pros and cons. I can tell you that by my experience
that Java sells better as a concept (it helped to sell lots of computer
mags in the past) But at the end of the day, Perl applications are usually
much more flexible for changing and tunning. The simple thought of EJB and
EJB-QL makes me be sure of this.

So what are the pros ?


Gabor
ps. Basically these were the answeres I got from someone who is not even a
VP.
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Re: major advocacy help needed
rlmcdo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-05 22:04:39 
Re: major advocacy help needed
gabor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-06 10:25:47 
Re: major advocacy help needed
simon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-06 09:30:12 
Re: major advocacy help needed
ziggy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-06 10:37:48 
Re: major advocacy help needed
ajsavige@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-04-08 19:36:48 
Re: major advocacy help needed
lembark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-04-09 22:38:26 
Commercial support ?
gabor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-12 22:11:31 
Re: Commercial support ?
david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-12 13:07:46 
Re: Commercial support ?
liz@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (E  2004-04-13 13:44:32 
Re: Commercial support ?
jadams01@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-04-13 17:48:09 
Re: Commercial support ?
david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-13 08:57:04 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 8:53:41 CST 2008.