Re: threads vs memory layout

by "Sergey P. Derevyago" <non-existent@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 3, 2008 at 06:30 PM

Dave Butenhof wrote:
> Most people don't: they just end up writing things like "I added threads

> to my application, and I'm using all the right synchronization, but my 
> application got 10 times slower so threads are stupid".
 >
	Sure, MT isn't about locking but is defined by an application DESIGN 
that ALLOWS for concurrent or simultaneous execution (as I cited you in 
my C++ multithreading tutorial 
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.programming.threads/msg/b52ce202a371778b).
	Please take a look, it contains some really interesting charts and
timings.
--
          With all respect, Sergey.               http://ders.stml.net/
          mailto : ders at skeptik.net

7 Posts in Topic:

threads vs memory layout

Hallvard B Furuseth <h

2008-09-25 22:43:10

Re: threads vs memory layout

David Schwartz <davids

2008-09-25 13:47:32

Re: threads vs memory layout

Dave Butenhof <david.b

2008-09-26 06:25:06

Re: threads vs memory layout

"Sergey P. Derevyago