Ivan Levashew wrote:
> That's why I prefer Ada: familiar syntax, modern features, respected
> standard, free software crossplatform implementation.
>
Without turning this into a conversation on Ada, that language is
getting more attention nowadays as a multicore language. Basically,
there is no way that a highly threaded/multicore application is going
to be reasonably created with an insecure language. You can add
monitors to C/C++, but its meaningless because none of the
restrictions on access that monitors give are enforceable. Just go
look at all the threads on "man, my pthreads application crashes",
etc.
Scott Moore
|
