In article <ahiawcFb+AaHFw2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Martin Liddle <news09@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In message <Jonas.Maebe-DBD33D.16535818122007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Jonas
> Maebe <Jonas.Maebe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
> >
> >Since it's written in GPC, I'm not sure why you'd use another compiler
> >on Mac OS X.
> >
> >> If I want to
> >> add a simple GUI to select a file what would be the easiest way?
> >
> Thanks for the reply. Well one issue is that, unless I am not reading
> correctly, I can't produce Intel binaries on a Power PC Mac using OS X
> 10.3. I would need to upgrade to 10.4 which as I am doing this for
> nothing and it isn't my Mac, I am reluctant to do.
>
> As it is only 500 hundred lines, of mainly straightforward code, it
> wouldn't be difficult to ****t. Would FreePascal allow creation of both
> Power PC and Intel binaries?
Not easily. Apple doesn't supply any developer utilities for targeting
Intel Macs for Mac OS X 10.3 (nor the associated development libraries),
so you'd have to manually compile the assembler and linker, and
extract/install a Mac OS X 10.4.x sdk from a newer Xcode distribution
than what can be installed on Mac OS X 10.3.
Jonas
|
