Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Pascal Misc > Re: The standar...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 11 Topic 767 of 811
Post > Topic >>

Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!

by "gedumer1" <gedumer1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 6, 2007 at 07:10 PM

Here's a better example:

Its or It's?

Its is the possessive pronoun; it modifies a noun.


It's is a contraction of it is or it has.


  Incorrect: The mother cat carried it's kitten in it's mouth.
  (Possessive pronoun, no apostrophe)

  Correct: The mother cat carried its kitten in its mouth.

  Correct: I think it's going to rain today.
  (Contraction of it is)

  Correct: It's been a very long time.
  (Contraction of it has)

  http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000227.htm

Gary.

"gedumer1" <gedumer1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:4806j.20685$rc2.15716@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm sorry, but I have to correct Rene... "great improvement on its 
> successors" is the correct usage of the word "its". The rule is as 
> follows:
>
> It's versus Its.
>
> There's no shortcut; all you can do is memorize the rule. It's with an 
> apostrophe means it is (or, a little less often and a little less 
> formally, it has); its without an apostrophe means belonging to it. An 
> analogue might provide a mnemonic: think of "he's" ("he is" gets an 
> apostrophe) and "his" ("belonging to him" doesn't).
>
> What about its', with the apostrophe after the s? - Never, never, never.

> Wrong, wrong, wrong. Not in this language, you don't. Its, "belonging to

> it"; it's, it is. That's all. [Revised 8 June 2001.] see: 
> http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/i.html
>
> Scott... you were right the first time. Same goes for "But in it's 
> original form". It should be "But in its original form".
>
> Gary.
>
> "scott moore" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:DYSdne29eIKEvc_anZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Rene Kita wrote:
>>> scott moore wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                     http://www.standardpascal.org
>>>
>>> Thank you for a great site. There is too little about Pascal left on
the 
>>> web.
>>>
>>> Two typos, if you don't mind:
>>> *great improvement on it's successors
>>> ->great improvement on its successors
>>>                               http://www.standardpascal.org
>>>
>>> *renumerations
>>> ->remuneration
>>>                    http://www.standardpascal.org/compiler.html
>>
>> Thank you thank you, I'll fix that.
>>
>> Scott Moore
>
>
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
scott moore <nospam@[E  2007-11-28 01:07:17 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
Marco van de Voort <ma  2007-11-28 14:50:56 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
scott moore <nospam@[E  2007-11-29 23:41:53 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
Rene Kita <renekita@[E  2007-11-30 13:16:24 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
scott moore <nospam@[E  2007-12-01 19:01:45 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
"gedumer1" <  2007-12-06 19:06:24 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
"gedumer1" <  2007-12-06 19:10:15 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
"Chris Burrows"  2007-12-07 13:01:29 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
scott moore <nospam@[E  2007-12-09 18:07:39 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
Keith Bowes <keith_bow  2007-12-23 05:05:29 
Re: The standard Pascal web site, moved and updated!
scott moore <nospam@[E  2007-12-01 19:00:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 0:44:12 CDT 2008.