Re: read shows surprising results

On 2007-02-17, Dirk Weber <dirk-weber@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 17.02.07, schrieb NoSpamPleaseButThisIsValid3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 in
45d5937d$0$6440$9b4e6d93@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In all other cases use ReadKey.
>
> Yes, but that sometimes may result in having to transform a char to an  
> integer (non technically expressed), readkey only accepts char input.

I think he meant the trick is that you can construct your own input
validation that way, and that a mistake of the user doesn't lead to a
runtime error.