Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Pascal Borland > Re: Some miscel...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 7 Topic 1030 of 1118
Post > Topic >>

Re: Some miscellaneous pascal esoterica

by "winston19842005@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <winston19842005@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 25, 2007 at 05:15 AM

On May 25, 7:37 am, HubbleBubble <phil_simm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> C allows you to do 'dangerous
> things' with pointers like above whereas pascal and nearly all other
> languages don't, or make you jump through hoops to acheive the same
> result. I have alot more respect fo C now and though I'm a dedicated
> pascal person I can now see where the c programmers claim that its
> often easier to low level stuff in C is coming from...
>

And this is why Microsoft has to deploy so many updates and patches.
These "dangerous things" lead to exploitation - I'm sure there is
probably a Wiki about "buffer overflow". Pointers cannot do range-
checking, if they aren't associated with an array.
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Re: Some miscellaneous pascal esoterica
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-05-23 05:48:38 
Re: Some miscellaneous pascal esoterica
Marco van de Voort <ma  2007-05-24 21:20:06 
Re: Some miscellaneous pascal esoterica
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-05-24 15:37:18 
Re: Some miscellaneous pascal esoterica
Marco van de Voort <ma  2007-05-25 07:09:27 
Re: Some miscellaneous pascal esoterica
HubbleBubble <phil_sim  2007-05-25 04:37:09 
Re: Some miscellaneous pascal esoterica
Marco van de Voort <ma  2007-05-25 12:08:25 
Re: Some miscellaneous pascal esoterica
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-05-25 05:15:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 0:27:32 CDT 2008.