Re: Konvalina/Wileman exercises

Chris Burrows said:

> "Richard Heathfield" <rjh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:Bc2dncCZNdOsdrDbnZ2dnUVZ8tfinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Another six are up now for peer review:
>>
>> 
http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/****table/pascal/pwp/exercises/ch04/index.php
>>
>> #1 is ugly, no two ways about it. I was determined to use loops, even
>> when it meant coming up with the most truly abysmal customised hash
>> I've ever seen.
> 
> Have 'for' loops been introduced at that stage into the text?

No, actually, but I'm not overly worried about that, and you are correct 
that it would be clearer. I'll fix it up. Thanks.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.