Done. I agree that it's a good idea to have all the PIP discussions
there for the sake of easy search 5 years from now, but perhaps at
this stage, when people aren't monitoring the SF forums, yet, it'll be
nice to paste the replies in this Usenet group as well; after all,
it's not like this group is overloading the Internet backbone...
Uri
On Feb 6, 12:34=A0am, "K.S. Bhaskar" <ksbhas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 10:01 am, Uri Schor <urisc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Gee, it's awfully quit here - I'd expect this to draw a few
comments...
>
> > First, I have to say that it's an excellent move, and it'll be nice to
> > see and try the long awaited JDBC driver of GT.M. The tools look very
> > sharp (nice usage of GWT, Eclipse, and other OSS!), and it's nice to
> > get a first look at PSL - yet another M++ dialect.
>
> [KSB] Thanks, Uri.
>
> > Although I only took a short look, I already have a few questions:
> > 1. =A0 =A0 =A0Where's the source code? I can't find it anywhere.
> > 2. =A0 =A0 =A0Any documentation on how to map existing globals to SQL
ac=
cess?
> > 3. =A0 =A0 =A0I can't seem to find the PSL to C/SQL compiler either. I
s=
ee that
> > both the Eclipse plugin and the web tool can "test compile", but
> > where's the compiler itself?
> > 4. =A0 =A0 =A0PSL seems to be pretty much a superset of M, with a few
ex=
ceptions
> > mentioned in the docs. Is it correct to say that PIP contains an M to
> > C/SQL compiler, or something very close to that?
> > 5. =A0 =A0 =A0Are there any live systems running at Fidelity customers
o=
n Oracle,
> > after automatic PIP compilation? How are they performing?
>
> [KSB] How about if you post the above on the forums at Source Forge
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pip)
and we respond there? =A0That way,
> all the PIP related discussion will be in one place.
>
> Regards
> -- Bhaskar
> ks dot bhaskar at fnis dot com <-- send e-mail here
|
