Re: New forum for MUMPS technology

On Dec 21, 2:09 am, "Maury Pepper" <mpepper_scram_s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "Ed de Moel" <dem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:476B11A8.6010206@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
>
> >> The signal to noise ratio on comp.lang.mumps has deteriorated.
>
> > I don't understand. Maybe my ISP filters the noise, but all the
> > noise I have seen on this newsgroup over the past year are two
> > or three messages that really didn't belong here.
> > Other than that, the signal has been over 99% on topic...
>
> > Just my $0.02
>
> > Ed
> > --
>
> Curious thing -- I subscribe to this list at two different locations --
each
> with a different ISP.  The one at home does get the occasional spam, but
the
> one at the lab never gets it.  Apparently some news feeds have spam
filters
> and some don't.

[KSB] Take a look at http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.mumps
where I read it.  All I see is advertisements for cigarettes and posts
about MI5 persecution, interspersed with a MUMPS thread every few
pages.

Regards
-- Bhaskar