I think you are the head of the project, so I prefer let that clear,
giving you the recognize of leading the project.
As we know the project is aproved on sourceforge
https://sourceforge.net/projects/m3clipse/
However we must think if the plugin will be distributed with m3
distribution sources.
In that case, we must ask whether the EPL license is compatible with
the m3 distribution licences.
If not, as we may think, because of the nature of the package, we can
think that EPL will be compatible with GPL software (look on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License
).
Daniel Benavides
Bert Laverman wrote:
> A related question, and I hope with more reponses.
>
> What license, and who do we assign the copyright to?
>
> I have been browsing Eclipse and Apache licensing pages,
> and getting confused. The Apache folks warn about personal
> copyrights, as that (according to them) opens you up for
> personal lawsiuts. Now I am going to provide all without
> any warranty, (as the licenses usually shout "IMPLIED OR
> OTHERWISE") but don't know what to make of that. I'm in
> Europe, so lawsuiting isn't as crazy as it is in the US, but
> what do you all think?
>
> Bert Laverman
|
