Programming > Modula 3 > Re: Why?

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Post A New Topic

Post a Reply

Post 13 of 20 Topic 128 of 149

Re: Why?

by Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 29, 2006 at 12:06 PM

Olaf Wagner writes:
> As far as I remember the FSF didn't accept the code (long time
> ago now) because they didn't like the way the gcc backend was
> decoupled from the rest of the compiler (avoiding the tainting
> of all the rest of the M3 sources with the license).

Yes.  See <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-06/msg00010.html>.

-- 
Hallvard

20 Posts in Topic:

Gary Scott <garylscott

2006-06-15 01:42:20

Pascal Bourguignon <pj

2006-06-15 08:17:13

Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA

2006-06-15 14:04:33

Ken Rose <kenrose@[EMA

2006-06-15 09:08:23

Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA

2006-06-15 20:48:03

Roland Illig <roland.i

2006-06-22 01:20:39

Roland Illig <roland.i

2006-06-22 01:31:46

Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E

2006-06-19 21:04:24

Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA

2006-06-20 23:36:38

Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E

2006-06-27 21:12:04

Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA

2006-06-28 21:30:11

Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E

2006-06-29 08:15:43

Re: Why?

Hallvard B Furuseth <h

2006-06-29 12:06:52

Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA

2006-06-29 14:20:00

Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E

2006-07-03 08:11:47

Andrew Reilly <andrew-

2006-11-28 13:55:07

Tony Hosking <hosking@

2006-11-28 14:27:15

Riley <riley@[EMAIL PR

2006-12-17 09:48:06

root@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (

2006-06-19 20:09:08

Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E

2006-06-27 21:22:28

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 0:22:36 CDT 2008.