Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Modula 3 > Re: Why?
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 20 Topic 128 of 149
Post > Topic >>

Re: Why?

by Olaf Wagner <wagner@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 27, 2006 at 09:22 PM

Operator wrote:
> In article <4foappF1k1snbU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> 	Olaf Wagner <wagner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> [...]
>>The (more recent) CM3 compiler has been imtegrated into the PM3 code
>>distribution quite some time ago; differences between the code
>>distributions are not really that great. There has been no official
>>PM3 release though recently, since Elego uses and concentrates on
>>the CM3 distribution.
> 
> 
> I'm using PM3 ****ted by John Polstra on FreeBSD.
> Currently there is no maintainer and recently there was a call for
> volunteers for unmaintained ****ts.
> Is an upgrade posible if you release the source?
> Or is CM3 the prefered dist?

The source for both the PM3 and CM3 distributions of Modula-3
is always available from the CVS repositories on
www.elegosoft.com via CVS and CVSup.

Elego has never made a PM3 release due to lack of resources;
anybody willing to do so is welcome, though. All the CM3 releases
have been pushed out by Elego workers (which is always a considerable
effort).

>>>[mapping /usr/include/sys and gcc backend]
>>
>>[working on backend]
>>
>>Staying up-to-date with respect to OS releases could still be made
>>much easier by abstracting most of the system specific interfaces
>>into a standard POSIX layer within the runtime and dealing with some
>>differences in C code. (Any volunteers for this project? :)
> 
> 
> Umm, is it doable by just using the default cc and /usr/include/sys ?
> (and some auto tools)

I'm afraid not :-( You would need to understand and refactor a fair
amount of M3 code in the m3core library.

Olaf
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Why?
Gary Scott <garylscott  2006-06-15 01:42:20 
Re: Why?
Pascal Bourguignon <pj  2006-06-15 08:17:13 
Re: Why?
Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA  2006-06-15 14:04:33 
Re: Why?
Ken Rose <kenrose@[EMA  2006-06-15 09:08:23 
Re: Why?
Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA  2006-06-15 20:48:03 
Re: Why?
Roland Illig <roland.i  2006-06-22 01:20:39 
Re: Why?
Roland Illig <roland.i  2006-06-22 01:31:46 
Re: Why?
Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E  2006-06-19 21:04:24 
Re: Why?
Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA  2006-06-20 23:36:38 
Re: Why?
Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E  2006-06-27 21:12:04 
Re: Why?
Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA  2006-06-28 21:30:11 
Re: Why?
Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E  2006-06-29 08:15:43 
Re: Why?
Hallvard B Furuseth <h  2006-06-29 12:06:52 
Re: Why?
Paul Vixie <vixie@[EMA  2006-06-29 14:20:00 
Re: Why?
Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E  2006-07-03 08:11:47 
Re: Why?
Andrew Reilly <andrew-  2006-11-28 13:55:07 
Re: Why?
Tony Hosking <hosking@  2006-11-28 14:27:15 
Re: Why?
Riley <riley@[EMAIL PR  2006-12-17 09:48:06 
Re: Why?
root@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2006-06-19 20:09:08 
Re: Why?
Olaf Wagner <wagner@[E  2006-06-27 21:22:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 5:26:00 CDT 2008.