Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Languages Misc > Re: reinventing...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 61 Topic 1118 of 1203
Post > Topic >>

Re: reinventing ASCII?

by ram@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Ram) Mar 5, 2008 at 03:26 AM

"Charlie Gordon" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>I'd make '0' - '9' and 'A' - 'Z' contiguous ;)
>Do you mean '9' + 1 == 'A' ?

  Some aspects of the original design where:

      - Digits and symbols they are usually paired with 
        on a keyboard should differ only by one 
        bit in order to simplify keyboard design
        (i.e., »1!«, »3#«, »4$«, and so on).

      - All (uppercase) letters should reside within 
        a single 5-bit block.

      - The lowest four bits of a digit should represent
        its value.

      - Due to technical reasons, »0000000« and »1111111«
        had to be control codes (NUL and DEL, respectively). 
        Therefore, the outer regions of the code were used 
        for control codes, while printable characters were 
        placed in the middle.
 




 61 Posts in Topic:
reinventing ASCII?
wildhalcyon <wild.halc  2008-03-03 05:56:01 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
"cr88192" <c  2008-03-04 05:35:03 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-03 15:13:13 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
Jacko <jackokring@[EMA  2008-03-03 12:58:14 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 10:19:06 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
Eliot Miranda <eliotm@  2008-03-04 13:18:31 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
"Charlie Gordon"  2008-03-05 03:58:24 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
ram@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S  2008-03-05 03:26:51 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-05 10:31:40 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
Edward Feustel <efeust  2008-03-05 06:32:23 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
James Harris <james.ha  2008-03-05 15:05:37 
Re: reinventing ASCII?
torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-06 11:34:33 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
James Harris <james.ha  2008-03-08 07:16:34 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-03-08 10:48:58 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-08 19:29:00 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Ulrich Eckhardt <dooms  2008-03-09 09:18:15 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-11 11:04:42 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
santosh <santosh.k83@[  2008-03-11 16:26:16 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-11 11:10:37 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-12 09:43:18 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
santosh <santosh.k83@[  2008-03-12 14:25:04 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Wilhelm B. Kloke&qu  2008-03-12 09:18:23 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Marco van de Voort <ma  2008-03-12 11:08:21 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Wilhelm B. Kloke&qu  2008-03-12 12:33:14 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Marco van de Voort <ma  2008-03-12 14:11:25 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Chris Dollin <chris.do  2008-03-12 13:33:42 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Wilhelm B. Kloke&qu  2008-03-12 15:34:40 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Default User"   2008-03-12 18:22:45 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Default User"   2008-03-12 18:22:45 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Default User"   2008-03-11 21:26:05 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Micah Cowan <micah@[EM  2008-03-11 15:14:10 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-11 22:27:14 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-03-08 09:45:05 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Ben Bacarisse <ben.use  2008-03-08 17:22:36 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-08 18:27:46 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
James Harris <james.ha  2008-03-09 17:16:03 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-10 01:08:23 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Ben Bacarisse <ben.use  2008-03-10 12:13:19 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
James Harris <james.ha  2008-03-10 08:45:25 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-10 19:26:16 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-03-10 21:03:06 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Marco van de Voort <ma  2008-03-11 11:06:14 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-03-11 15:22:58 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2008-03-13 17:37:20 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-03-14 09:32:54 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-03-14 09:21:41 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-14 17:48:27 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Morris Dovey <mrdovey@  2008-03-10 10:35:21 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-10 19:09:27 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Eric Sosman <esosman@[  2008-03-10 21:00:14 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Marco van de Voort <ma  2008-03-11 11:04:46 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-11 12:04:26 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
billg999@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-11 12:07:36 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Neilist <lattoralee@[E  2008-03-11 14:28:23 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-11 22:22:36 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Richard <devr_@[EMAIL   2008-03-11 23:23:21 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Jacko <jackokring@[EMA  2008-03-12 11:49:33 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
Micah Cowan <micah@[EM  2008-03-12 19:01:00 
Re: NUL to terminate strings
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-03-10 17:35:16 
Re: NUL to terminate strings
rlb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2008-03-14 09:28:38 
Re: NUL to terminate strings; was reinventing ASCII?
BruceMcF <agila61@[EMA  2008-04-12 18:27:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 18 23:05:39 CDT 2008.