Re: RFC: C and concurrency (as CC extensions)

"Roberto Waltman" <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:kqh0m3thi24kv0n8rkl2l9tg6jvd2vreiv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "cr88192" wrote:
>>"Roberto Waltman" wrote:
>>> See Gehani & Roome, "Concurrent C",
>>> (c) 1989 Silicon Press
>>> ISBN 0929306007
>>>
>>sorry, unless it is online and you provide a link, I have no way of 
>>looking
>>at this
>
> I don't believe the book is available on line, (not counting Google's
> preview), but some of Gehani's papers are, describing the his
> approach.
>
> These are a few first-page Goggle hits:
>
>
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/11917/http:zSzzSzwww.cs.engr.uky.eduzSz~dclarkezSzcs570_98szSzconcurrentc.pdf/concurrent-c.pdf
>
>
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/local/reading/proceedings/spe91-95/spe/vol22/issue3/spe759ng.pdf
>
>
http://books.google.com/books?id=ZDRBv8U_bJ0C&pg=PA251&lpg=PA251&dq=gehani+concurrent+c&source=web&ots=-A9eSQJv7u&sig=p72Kx2LlV69WThI63kcbMSX9UyA#PPP1,M1
>
> http://www.cs.njit.edu/gehani/publications.htm
>

yes, cool, I may get to looking at these.


well, one idea I encountered recently was CSP, which implementing as a 
library feature was simple enough that I did this during part of one of my

morning cl***** (diverting a little of my attention from the lecture...).

a next and possibly meaningful step would be to add syntax extensions for
it 
(this part may wait until after a minor effort at rewriting the upper end
of 
the compiler...).


>
> Roberto Waltman
>
> [ Please reply to the group,
>  return address is invalid ]