The message below is being cross-posted from the LogoForum. Please
reply here at comp.lang.logo and it will be cross-posted back to the
LogoForum. The original author of this message is
tomcsanyi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11:25 11.2.2008, Bertrand Carette wrote:
>Just a question, to mischievously boost the discussion :
>Can we standardize logo without it losing its soul?
Good point.
And my answer is "NO".
Logo is 40 (years old).
Can you imagine what happens if you try to force rules to a 40 years
old human who has lived all his previous life without keeping to strict
rules?
Peter
__._,_.___
LogoForum messages are archived at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LogoForum
> The message below is being cross-posted from the LogoForum. Please
> reply here at comp.lang.logo and it will be cross-posted back to the
> LogoForum. The original author of this message is
> taobert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> Brian Harvey says:
> > The /whole point/ of Logo is user interface. It's all Lisp inside,
> > but what makes Logo Logo is a collection of choices about what kids
will
> > find natural/easy/inviting.
>
> Logo as a natural, easy, user friendly Lisp... I agree
>
> Just a question, to mischievously boost the discussion:
> Can we standardize Logo without it losing its soul?
>
> (and what's the soul of Logo )
>
> Bertrand
>
>
> __._,_.___
> LogoForum messages are archived at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LogoForum
|
