Re: [LogoForum] Logo: Tests for compliance.

The message below is being cross-posted from the LogoForum.  Please 
reply here at comp.lang.logo and it will be cross-posted back to the 
LogoForum.  The original author of this message is 
pavel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Harvey wrote:
> My point is that there will be more kinds of differences than there have
> been in the dialects you've catalogued so far. But, by all means, try it
> and see how it goes.

Yes, I also thing this will happen, because most of the currently 
included dialects in the Atlas are from the UCBLogo family.

But without having all differences listed out it is hard to talk about 
any categorization...standardization...whatever.

Pavel

__._,_.___
LogoForum messages are archived at: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LogoForum


In article <fob86q$135n$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 bh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Brian Harvey) wrote:

> pavel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says:
> >Why? The Great Logo Atlas will just describe the similarities and the 
> >differences.
> 
> My point is that there will be more kinds of differences than there have
> been in the dialects you've catalogued so far.  But, by all means, try
it
> and see how it goes.