[LogoForum] Logo: Tests for compliance.

The message below is being cross-posted from the LogoForum.  Please 
reply here at comp.lang.logo and it will be cross-posted back to the 
LogoForum.  The original author of this message is 
clemrutter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 am still being asked the question: Is this a LOGO, or is this not a
LOGO? This is usually followed by the question If this is not a LOGO,
what do I need to do to make it LOGO? So can we as a group get
together to make up a definitive definition, and put together may be 5
one line tests that can be used to illustrate this? 

1a. Basic syntax

A test maybe: make "n 100 if 110 = sum first bf [ 7 10 23] :n [pr
[VALID]]

1b. Basic graphics
A test may be: etc

2. Base system- both 1a and 1b validate 

3. Base system with trig functions 

4. UCB compliant

5. UCB compliant with extensions as listed.

These are purely illustrative to start the conversation. But I
envisage we developers could aim for the tests. We could then describe
a logo as say 'Level 2 but missing the fill facility '.

There are lots of issues- but could we have a go!

__._,_.___
LogoForum messages are archived at: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LogoForum