On Jul 25, 2:19 pm, "j.oke" <java....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 24 Lug, 08:59, "jhc0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <jhc0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > is super-cool
>
> On 24 Lug, 08:59, "jhc0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <jhc0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > ... super-cool ...
>
> What's the better language: hebrew or english?
>
> Well, the first one is simple and perfect, and the second one goes all
> for convenience (mixed to european history, which took origin from
> latin, which took origin from greek, which took origin from egyptian,
> which took origin from hebrew (and so the circle is finally closed
> again)).
Ummm, no. I think you're talking about the *alphabet*, not the
language. The English language is part of a large group of languages
called Indo-European, and Hebrew isn't part of this group (nor is
Egyptian). Where this language originated is controversial; one
theory is somewhere northeast of the Black Sea. I don't think you're
quite right about the alphabets, either; the Greek and Hebrew
alphabets are both more or less directly derived from the Phoenician
alphabet, and Egyptian hieroglyphics don't figure into it at all.
> ... super-pedantic ...
-- Adam
|
