Programming > Lisp > Re: SBCL is now...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better

by Paul Donnelly <paul-donnelly@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 23, 2008 at 02:41 PM

Raffael Cavallaro
<raffaelcavallaro@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'espam-s'il-vous-plait-mac.com> writes:

> IOW, you will never match Wynton Marsalis's musical expressiveniss no
> matter how well you play the kazoo. Saying you are "stuck" with
> notepad is like saying you want to play jazz with Wynton Marsalis but
> are "stuck" with the kazoo.

Better not try to take the analogy this far--the kazoo strikes me as a
more
flexible instrument than the trumpet.

262 Posts in Topic:

SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting bett

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-24 22:12:35

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-06-25 01:38:29

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ois=EDn_Ma

2008-06-25 07:17:17

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-06-25 17:32:58

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-25 07:38:58

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-06-25 20:21:31

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-06-26 07:52:47

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-09 20:11:59

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-10 10:39:29

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 03:40:19

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-12 06:30:29

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 15:12:07

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-12 07:26:28

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Duane Rettig <duane@[E

2008-07-12 08:44:03

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-12 10:27:46

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mark Wooding <mdw@[EMA

2008-07-15 10:41:59

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Gene <gene.ressler@[EM

2008-07-15 18:09:22

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-25 07:54:57

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-09 22:52:31

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@

2008-07-09 22:29:23

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-06-25 08:16:57

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mark Tarver <dr.mtarve

2008-06-25 09:15:43

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-06-25 13:28:24

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_Rune_

2008-06-25 20:25:40

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ois=EDn_Ma

2008-06-25 13:33:56

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Rainer Joswig <joswig@

2008-06-25 23:03:41

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jaycx2.3.calrobert@[EMAIL

2008-07-11 12:47:57

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 02:07:42

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jaycx2.3.calrobert@[EMAIL

2008-07-11 13:40:29

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 03:35:18

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 03:21:06

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

dlweinreb1@[EMAIL PROTECT

2008-06-26 04:40:20

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"John Thingstad"

2008-06-26 18:13:28

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 05:41:57

Better measure of program length?

are <Proponent@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 06:37:52

Re: Better measure of program length?

jaycx2.3.calrobert@[EMAIL

2008-07-11 11:22:02

Re: Better measure of program length?

Matthias Buelow <mkb@[

2008-07-11 20:42:28

Re: Better measure of program length?

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-11 15:42:11

Re: Better measure of program length?

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 07:24:54

Re: Better measure of program length?

"John Thingstad"

2008-06-26 17:24:38

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Isaac Gouy <igouy2@[EM

2008-06-26 08:19:05

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 08:22:09

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-09 19:58:42

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 11:00:52

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 11:13:38

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 11:54:21

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 15:28:23

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-06-26 18:44:05

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-06-27 09:24:19

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Chris Russell <christo

2008-06-27 01:54:17

Re: Better measure of program length?

Slobodan Blazeski <slo

2008-06-27 02:52:53

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ois=EDn_Ma

2008-06-27 03:57:58

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-27 07:52:30

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-06-27 18:13:50

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-27 09:21:23

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-06-27 10:00:50

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-06-27 20:50:36

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-27 22:18:32

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pls.mrjm@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-06-28 00:48:05

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-06-28 07:20:44

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"Thomas F. Burdick&q

2008-06-29 02:35:37

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-06-29 03:13:59

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-06-29 13:02:15

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

George Neuner <gneuner

2008-07-10 02:20:58

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-10 08:31:22

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

George Neuner <gneuner

2008-07-11 12:47:43

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-29 04:27:39

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-29 04:30:27

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Juanjo <juanjose.garci

2008-06-29 05:46:57

ECL libraries

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-29 06:25:13

Re: ECL libraries

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-06-29 19:25:09

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-06-29 07:23:59

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-06-29 12:27:08

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-06-29 17:44:57

Re: ECL libraries

Juanjo <juanjose.garci

2008-06-30 03:46:31

Re: ECL libraries

Rainer Joswig <joswig@

2008-06-30 15:42:59

Re: ECL libraries

Juanjo <juanjose.garci

2008-06-30 09:34:15

Re: ECL libraries

Juanjo <juanjose.garci

2008-06-30 11:20:39

Re: ECL libraries

Rainer Joswig <joswig@

2008-06-30 23:02:02

Re: ECL libraries

Juanjo <juanjose.garci

2008-06-30 11:22:53

Re: ECL libraries

Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL

2008-06-30 13:06:58

Re: ECL libraries

Juanjo <juanjose.garci

2008-06-30 23:28:50

Re: ECL libraries

Juanjo <juanjose.garci

2008-06-30 23:37:34

Re: ECL libraries

Javier <javuchi.NOSPAM

2008-07-01 11:32:11

Re: ECL libraries

luis.oliveira@[EMAIL PROT

2008-07-01 12:18:46

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Dan Weinreb <dlw@[EMAI

2008-07-01 05:31:11

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Rainer Joswig <joswig@

2008-07-01 15:04:06

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-09 20:09:34

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-10 10:41:14

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Dan Weinreb <dlw@[EMAI

2008-07-01 05:37:27

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Dan Weinreb <dlw@[EMAI

2008-07-01 05:42:22

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"John Thingstad"

2008-07-01 18:06:53

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"Alex Mizrahi"

2008-07-01 20:49:33

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Didier Verna <didier@[

2008-07-01 14:51:30

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

John Doe <not.here@[EM

2008-07-03 10:56:52

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

raymond.toy@[EMAIL PROTEC

2008-07-03 11:13:29

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Al <alan.falloon@[EMAI

2008-07-03 09:38:06

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-09 16:10:57

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-09 17:20:46

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-10 12:33:25

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-10 04:59:14

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-10 14:19:33

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

=?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw?

2008-07-19 07:47:28

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-19 12:34:00

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

=?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw?

2008-07-19 13:14:44

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Rainer Joswig <joswig@

2008-07-19 15:26:33

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-19 18:53:32

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-10 07:19:30

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"John Thingstad"

2008-07-10 16:52:41

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-10 19:49:20

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-10 18:25:13

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"John Thingstad"

2008-07-11 02:18:50

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-10 20:30:42

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-11 10:34:38

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@

2008-07-11 20:10:34

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 02:22:20

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@

2008-07-14 18:47:33

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-14 20:45:15

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@

2008-07-14 20:44:47

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@

2008-07-14 21:37:31

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-14 22:46:15

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Stefan Nobis <snobis@[

2008-07-15 13:35:38

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"John Thingstad"

2008-07-22 23:19:36

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Christophe <christophe

2008-07-16 00:57:38

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-16 05:06:12

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-16 11:36:05

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Christophe <christophe

2008-07-16 05:33:41

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-16 09:11:47

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-11 03:13:57

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-11 03:45:44

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pls.mrjm@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-07-11 08:53:15

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-11 18:09:50

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-07-11 20:41:51

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 15:00:55

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL

2008-07-11 20:50:54

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 14:24:59

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-12 01:37:48

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Patrick May <pjm@[EMAI

2008-07-12 13:21:11

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@

2008-07-14 19:02:12

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-14 20:56:38

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-12 01:39:19

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"Thomas F. Burdick&q

2008-07-12 01:41:35

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-12 02:48:05

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-12 03:12:10

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-12 12:22:47

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 19:13:31

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-13 01:41:19

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-13 11:35:56

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-13 11:46:36

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-13 21:56:59

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Pascal Costanza <pc@[E

2008-07-13 23:40:39

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-13 17:43:39

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-13 18:30:34

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-14 18:35:10

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-14 22:04:18

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Nicolas Neuss <lastnam

2008-07-15 11:13:09

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-15 07:48:18

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-16 01:34:57

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-12 06:36:15

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Duane Rettig <duane@[E

2008-07-12 08:34:50

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-12 07:43:55

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 17:03:14

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pls.mrjm@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-07-12 08:15:31

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 16:39:21

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-12 09:45:41

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-12 10:08:15

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-12 22:05:39

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pls.mrjm@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-07-12 10:20:00

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Brian <quickbasicguru@

2008-07-12 12:53:45

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-13 00:25:50

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-12 16:31:42

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-13 01:42:26

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-12 22:38:18

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jayessay <nospam@[EMAI

2008-07-13 09:14:56

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-13 12:44:46

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Marco Antoniotti <marc

2008-07-14 00:34:15

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-14 20:27:09

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI

2008-07-14 13:22:45

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

George Neuner <gneuner

2008-07-14 23:43:37

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-16 01:48:55

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mark Wooding <mdw@[EMA

2008-07-15 11:01:07

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Christophe <christophe

2008-07-15 14:16:05

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Ariel <no@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-07-16 05:24:10

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-16 11:23:22

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-16 16:09:48

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-16 16:31:14

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (

2008-07-16 20:34:51

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-16 23:27:12

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (

2008-07-17 04:13:27

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-17 21:15:48

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-17 21:44:16

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-17 22:51:56

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-18 01:53:48

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-20 12:41:49

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-20 11:23:30

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (

2008-07-17 21:02:27

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

=?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw?

2008-07-19 08:36:01

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Ariel <no@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-07-16 05:42:17

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Ariel <no@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-07-16 06:08:13

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Ariel <no@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-07-16 15:29:34

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-17 01:47:31

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-16 21:09:32

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Andrew Reilly <andrew-

2008-07-17 04:53:47

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-17 03:32:12

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-17 11:31:24

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-19 04:00:01

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-19 13:42:43

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Rainer Joswig <joswig@

2008-07-19 14:39:39

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-19 07:14:49

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-19 07:19:55

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-19 11:18:17

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-19 18:33:10

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-20 01:15:40

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-20 12:37:52

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@

2008-07-20 15:43:20

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-20 01:22:14

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-20 01:36:47

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-20 12:08:07

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Joost Kremers <joostkr

2008-07-20 16:38:25

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-20 15:22:36

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL

2008-07-20 22:33:06

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-20 20:33:56

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-22 23:17:47

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-23 01:12:12

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"milanj@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-07-20 03:22:24

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-20 05:46:10

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-20 05:47:37

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-20 09:38:45

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-20 15:30:11

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

blandest <Valentin.Bac

2008-07-20 16:43:02

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-21 00:27:03

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-21 07:51:07

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-21 00:30:28

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Joost Kremers <joostkr

2008-07-21 16:42:22

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-21 00:32:33

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-21 01:54:16

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Duane Rettig <duane@[E

2008-07-21 09:21:14

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-21 20:19:49

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

George Neuner <gneuner

2008-07-21 14:23:56

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Steve Allan <takezowes

2008-07-22 12:57:31

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

George Neuner <gneuner

2008-07-22 16:59:32

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-21 14:08:22

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Cor Gest <cor@[EMAIL P

2008-07-21 23:43:19

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-22 01:36:09

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-22 01:41:35

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Duane Rettig <duane@[E

2008-07-22 08:21:58

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-22 12:46:52

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Rainer Joswig <joswig@

2008-07-22 20:09:05

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Paul Donnelly <paul-do

2008-07-22 14:11:08

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@

2008-07-22 22:46:23

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Raffael Cavallaro <raf

2008-07-23 13:05:05

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Paul Donnelly <paul-do

2008-07-23 14:41:02

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI

2008-07-23 15:57:58

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-22 14:10:19

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vassil Nikolov <vnikol

2008-07-22 23:25:33

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-23 01:45:56

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR

2008-07-23 12:07:23

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

"Tobias C. Rittweile

2008-07-23 21:26:31

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Ali <emailaliclark@[EM

2008-07-23 15:10:24

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Rainer Joswig <joswig@

2008-07-24 00:23:27

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-07-24 00:35:24

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

Mikael Jansson <mikael

2008-07-23 23:57:06

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 20:02:49 CDT 2008.