Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Lisp > Re: SBCL is now...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 262 Topic 12874 of 13806
Post > Topic >>

Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting

by Gene <gene.ressler@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 15, 2008 at 06:09 PM

On Jul 15, 6:41=A0am, Mark Wooding <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> The non-tail-recursive factorial will blow the stack in more or less any
> language implementation. =A0(Yes, I did test it with OCaml, specifically
> version 3.10.2.) =A0Stupid techniques fail in most languages.

Perhaps this is slightly OT, but I hope someone targets LLVM with a CL
implementationl.  Check out http://llvm.org/demo/
, where the LLVM (a
general purpose compiler back end) optimizer converts naive recursive
factorial into a loop.  I saw some abstract interpretation techniques
to do this years ago, but did not expect to see a general purpose back
end (mostly for imperative languages) actually implement it...
 




 262 Posts in Topic:
SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting bett
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-24 22:12:35 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-06-25 01:38:29 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ois=EDn_Ma  2008-06-25 07:17:17 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-06-25 17:32:58 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-25 07:38:58 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-06-25 20:21:31 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-06-26 07:52:47 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-09 20:11:59 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-10 10:39:29 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 03:40:19 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-12 06:30:29 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 15:12:07 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-12 07:26:28 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Duane Rettig <duane@[E  2008-07-12 08:44:03 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-12 10:27:46 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mark Wooding <mdw@[EMA  2008-07-15 10:41:59 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Gene <gene.ressler@[EM  2008-07-15 18:09:22 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-25 07:54:57 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-09 22:52:31 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-07-09 22:29:23 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-06-25 08:16:57 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mark Tarver <dr.mtarve  2008-06-25 09:15:43 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-06-25 13:28:24 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_Rune_  2008-06-25 20:25:40 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ois=EDn_Ma  2008-06-25 13:33:56 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Rainer Joswig <joswig@  2008-06-25 23:03:41 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jaycx2.3.calrobert@[EMAIL  2008-07-11 12:47:57 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 02:07:42 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jaycx2.3.calrobert@[EMAIL  2008-07-11 13:40:29 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 03:35:18 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 03:21:06 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
dlweinreb1@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-26 04:40:20 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"John Thingstad"  2008-06-26 18:13:28 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 05:41:57 
Better measure of program length?
are <Proponent@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 06:37:52 
Re: Better measure of program length?
jaycx2.3.calrobert@[EMAIL  2008-07-11 11:22:02 
Re: Better measure of program length?
Matthias Buelow <mkb@[  2008-07-11 20:42:28 
Re: Better measure of program length?
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-11 15:42:11 
Re: Better measure of program length?
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 07:24:54 
Re: Better measure of program length?
"John Thingstad"  2008-06-26 17:24:38 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Isaac Gouy <igouy2@[EM  2008-06-26 08:19:05 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 08:22:09 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-09 19:58:42 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 11:00:52 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 11:13:38 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 11:54:21 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 15:28:23 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-06-26 18:44:05 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-06-27 09:24:19 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Chris Russell <christo  2008-06-27 01:54:17 
Re: Better measure of program length?
Slobodan Blazeski <slo  2008-06-27 02:52:53 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ois=EDn_Ma  2008-06-27 03:57:58 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 07:52:30 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-06-27 18:13:50 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 09:21:23 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 10:00:50 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 20:50:36 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 22:18:32 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pls.mrjm@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-28 00:48:05 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-06-28 07:20:44 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"Thomas F. Burdick&q  2008-06-29 02:35:37 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-29 03:13:59 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-06-29 13:02:15 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
George Neuner <gneuner  2008-07-10 02:20:58 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-10 08:31:22 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
George Neuner <gneuner  2008-07-11 12:47:43 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-29 04:27:39 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-29 04:30:27 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Juanjo <juanjose.garci  2008-06-29 05:46:57 
ECL libraries
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-29 06:25:13 
Re: ECL libraries
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-06-29 19:25:09 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-29 07:23:59 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-06-29 12:27:08 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-06-29 17:44:57 
Re: ECL libraries
Juanjo <juanjose.garci  2008-06-30 03:46:31 
Re: ECL libraries
Rainer Joswig <joswig@  2008-06-30 15:42:59 
Re: ECL libraries
Juanjo <juanjose.garci  2008-06-30 09:34:15 
Re: ECL libraries
Juanjo <juanjose.garci  2008-06-30 11:20:39 
Re: ECL libraries
Rainer Joswig <joswig@  2008-06-30 23:02:02 
Re: ECL libraries
Juanjo <juanjose.garci  2008-06-30 11:22:53 
Re: ECL libraries
Javier <javuchi@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 13:06:58 
Re: ECL libraries
Juanjo <juanjose.garci  2008-06-30 23:28:50 
Re: ECL libraries
Juanjo <juanjose.garci  2008-06-30 23:37:34 
Re: ECL libraries
Javier <javuchi.NOSPAM  2008-07-01 11:32:11 
Re: ECL libraries
luis.oliveira@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-01 12:18:46 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Dan Weinreb <dlw@[EMAI  2008-07-01 05:31:11 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Rainer Joswig <joswig@  2008-07-01 15:04:06 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-09 20:09:34 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-10 10:41:14 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Dan Weinreb <dlw@[EMAI  2008-07-01 05:37:27 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Dan Weinreb <dlw@[EMAI  2008-07-01 05:42:22 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"John Thingstad"  2008-07-01 18:06:53 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"Alex Mizrahi"   2008-07-01 20:49:33 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Didier Verna <didier@[  2008-07-01 14:51:30 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
John Doe <not.here@[EM  2008-07-03 10:56:52 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
raymond.toy@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-07-03 11:13:29 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Al <alan.falloon@[EMAI  2008-07-03 09:38:06 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-09 16:10:57 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-09 17:20:46 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-10 12:33:25 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-10 04:59:14 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-10 14:19:33 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
=?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw?  2008-07-19 07:47:28 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-19 12:34:00 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
=?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw?  2008-07-19 13:14:44 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Rainer Joswig <joswig@  2008-07-19 15:26:33 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-19 18:53:32 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-10 07:19:30 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"John Thingstad"  2008-07-10 16:52:41 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-10 19:49:20 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-10 18:25:13 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"John Thingstad"  2008-07-11 02:18:50 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-10 20:30:42 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-11 10:34:38 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-07-11 20:10:34 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 02:22:20 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-07-14 18:47:33 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-14 20:45:15 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-07-14 20:44:47 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-07-14 21:37:31 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-14 22:46:15 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Stefan Nobis <snobis@[  2008-07-15 13:35:38 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"John Thingstad"  2008-07-22 23:19:36 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Christophe <christophe  2008-07-16 00:57:38 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-16 05:06:12 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-16 11:36:05 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Christophe <christophe  2008-07-16 05:33:41 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-16 09:11:47 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-11 03:13:57 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-11 03:45:44 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pls.mrjm@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-11 08:53:15 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-11 18:09:50 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-07-11 20:41:51 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 15:00:55 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Don Geddis <don@[EMAIL  2008-07-11 20:50:54 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 14:24:59 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-12 01:37:48 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Patrick May <pjm@[EMAI  2008-07-12 13:21:11 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-07-14 19:02:12 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-14 20:56:38 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-12 01:39:19 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"Thomas F. Burdick&q  2008-07-12 01:41:35 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-12 02:48:05 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-12 03:12:10 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-12 12:22:47 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 19:13:31 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-13 01:41:19 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-13 11:35:56 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-13 11:46:36 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-13 21:56:59 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Pascal Costanza <pc@[E  2008-07-13 23:40:39 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-13 17:43:39 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-13 18:30:34 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-14 18:35:10 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-14 22:04:18 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Nicolas Neuss <lastnam  2008-07-15 11:13:09 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-15 07:48:18 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-16 01:34:57 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-12 06:36:15 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Duane Rettig <duane@[E  2008-07-12 08:34:50 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-12 07:43:55 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 17:03:14 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pls.mrjm@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-12 08:15:31 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 16:39:21 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-12 09:45:41 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-12 10:08:15 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-12 22:05:39 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pls.mrjm@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-12 10:20:00 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Brian <quickbasicguru@  2008-07-12 12:53:45 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-13 00:25:50 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-12 16:31:42 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-13 01:42:26 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-12 22:38:18 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jayessay <nospam@[EMAI  2008-07-13 09:14:56 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-13 12:44:46 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Marco Antoniotti <marc  2008-07-14 00:34:15 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-14 20:27:09 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
jon.harrop.ms.sharp@[EMAI  2008-07-14 13:22:45 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
George Neuner <gneuner  2008-07-14 23:43:37 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-16 01:48:55 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mark Wooding <mdw@[EMA  2008-07-15 11:01:07 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Christophe <christophe  2008-07-15 14:16:05 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Ariel <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-16 05:24:10 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-16 11:23:22 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-16 16:09:48 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-16 16:31:14 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-16 20:34:51 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-16 23:27:12 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-17 04:13:27 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-17 21:15:48 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-17 21:44:16 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-17 22:51:56 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-18 01:53:48 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-20 12:41:49 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-20 11:23:30 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-17 21:02:27 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
=?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw?  2008-07-19 08:36:01 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Ariel <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-16 05:42:17 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Ariel <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-16 06:08:13 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Ariel <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-16 15:29:34 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-17 01:47:31 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-16 21:09:32 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Andrew Reilly <andrew-  2008-07-17 04:53:47 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-17 03:32:12 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-17 11:31:24 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-19 04:00:01 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-19 13:42:43 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Rainer Joswig <joswig@  2008-07-19 14:39:39 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-19 07:14:49 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-19 07:19:55 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-19 11:18:17 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-19 18:33:10 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-20 01:15:40 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-20 12:37:52 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-07-20 15:43:20 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-20 01:22:14 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-20 01:36:47 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-20 12:08:07 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Joost Kremers <joostkr  2008-07-20 16:38:25 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-20 15:22:36 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-07-20 22:33:06 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-20 20:33:56 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-22 23:17:47 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-23 01:12:12 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"milanj@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-20 03:22:24 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-20 05:46:10 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-20 05:47:37 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-20 09:38:45 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-20 15:30:11 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
blandest <Valentin.Bac  2008-07-20 16:43:02 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-21 00:27:03 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-21 07:51:07 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-21 00:30:28 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Joost Kremers <joostkr  2008-07-21 16:42:22 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-21 00:32:33 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-21 01:54:16 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Duane Rettig <duane@[E  2008-07-21 09:21:14 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-21 20:19:49 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
George Neuner <gneuner  2008-07-21 14:23:56 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Steve Allan <takezowes  2008-07-22 12:57:31 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
George Neuner <gneuner  2008-07-22 16:59:32 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-21 14:08:22 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Cor Gest <cor@[EMAIL P  2008-07-21 23:43:19 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-22 01:36:09 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-22 01:41:35 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Duane Rettig <duane@[E  2008-07-22 08:21:58 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-22 12:46:52 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Rainer Joswig <joswig@  2008-07-22 20:09:05 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Paul Donnelly <paul-do  2008-07-22 14:11:08 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@  2008-07-22 22:46:23 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Raffael Cavallaro <raf  2008-07-23 13:05:05 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Paul Donnelly <paul-do  2008-07-23 14:41:02 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Kenny <kentilton@[EMAI  2008-07-23 15:57:58 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-22 14:10:19 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vassil Nikolov <vnikol  2008-07-22 23:25:33 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-23 01:45:56 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Vend <vend82@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-23 12:07:23 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
"Tobias C. Rittweile  2008-07-23 21:26:31 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Ali <emailaliclark@[EM  2008-07-23 15:10:24 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Rainer Joswig <joswig@  2008-07-24 00:23:27 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
pjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-07-24 00:35:24 
Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting
Mikael Jansson <mikael  2008-07-23 23:57:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 8:00:32 CST 2008.