Re: Nigerian spammer harvesting from these newsgroups (was: A question (confusion) about closure)

On Wed, 28 May 2008 13:41:29 -0700, Robert Maas  wrote:

>Too bad the CAN-SPAM law protects MicroSoft from legal subpoenas
>Too bad MicroSoft has a policy of condoning use of their
>servers to sup****t criminal activity, taking full advantage of
>their CAN-SPAM immunity. Too bad the citizens of this country are
>too cowardly to take on MicroSoft directly by boycotting all their
>products and services until MicroSoft starts being part of the
>solution instead of part of the problem as they are currently.

I agree whole-heartedly.  Not to mention that I'm getting fed up
having to prove every time I turn around that I didn't steal  Billy
Gate's damned operating system.  Amazing that a company that makes me
keep proving over and over and over that I didn't steal their OS off
of MYSELF is a company that spent some time before a Senate
Investigation Committee looking into their "Questionable" business
practices.  

Regards,

Pedophiles, Child Molesters, Father Stabbers, Mother Rapers, ***ual
Molesters of Small Animals, Telemarketers (Teleterrorists), SPAMMERS,
Junk Mailers, Bank of America and anyone that would associate with
and/or work for one.

A L L   T H E   S A M E   F I L T H Y   T R A S H ..............