Pascal Costanza wrote:
> Ken Tilton wrote:
>
>>
>> Pascal Costanza wrote:
>>
>>> Ken Tilton wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> As PG said, when good programmers like something, don't argue,
>>>> download.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I am doing that. :-D
>>
>>
>> You'll need an application. :)
>
>
> What a totally surprising and unexpected insight.
Actually, you have my compassion. [I'm trying, Edi. I'm really trying.
<g>] How does one come up with a test application that is realistic,
defined as not having been conceived just to test something?
I guess the easiest would be to build a GUI for something sensible and
get a running start from Celtk or Cells-Gtk. If Peter H has made any
headway there might be a Cells-ODE out there, you can do a pinball game.
RoboCells was a great test for Cells and indeed forced the evolution of
Cells3. The bad news is that last I looked I had managed to lose the
core layer. Quite a feat given that I have generations of development
source trees all over every hard drive I own, in multiplicity.
People have told me Cells is kinda like KR. I have been tempted in the
past to find out how much and try building a LISA-like atop Cells.
The Grail of course nowadays is something like OpenAIR: Ajax with Cells
Inside(tm). The Cells archive over the past month will reveal fanciful
ruminations by moiself on how far that could be taken.
Just in case: the Fibonacci calculation was a joke. I said as much
(twice), but someone complained afterwards that it seemed like a
monstrous way to ... reminds me of the War of the Worlds panic,
apparently they stated repeatedly during the show that it was fiction.
Funny how that works.
kt
--
http://smuglispweeny.blogspot.com/
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/
ECLM rant:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1331906677993764413&hl=en
ECLM talk:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9173722505157942928&q=&hl=en
|
