On Jul 24, 6:56=A0am, beegee <bgul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 22, 3:13=A0pm, lorlarz <lorl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > With this in
> > mind I have made recommendations to John Resig on how YET more
ease-of-
> > review (and with it as much transparency as possible) could be
> > provided to users of the great jQuery JavaScript library, which proves
> > that unobtrusive javascript is the road to the future.
>
I'm not following that argument so well:
1. You have made recommendations to John on how more ease-of-review
could be provided.
Therfore: unobtrusive javascript is the road to the future
I am unclear on what the premise means and how it proves (or even
infers) the conclusion true.
Can you elaborate?
> > I am hoping the recommendations will be taken. =A0In any case, jQuery
> > will always be a lot better than YUI.
>
> Flame bait in sheep's clothing.
Based on what: The the criteria that you didn't list?
|
