Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Rick Merrill wrote:
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> tommybiegs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>> do***ent.write("<br><tt>Wed 7 May 9:25 am <\/tt>Old Movie
>>>> "Dawn Patrol"<br>" );
>>>>
>>>> should be:
>>>>
>>>> do***ent.write("<br><tt>Wed 7 May 9:25 am <\/tt>Old Movie
>>>> \"Dawn Patrol\"<br>" );
>>> Or if you want to avoid the escape sequences, simply
>>>
>>> do***ent.write('<br><tt>Wed 7 May 9:25 am <\/tt>Old
Movie
>>> "Dawn Patrol"<br>');
>>>
>>> While the markup is valid, from the usability and reliability
perspective
>>> the OP still has much to answer for. The whole thing should be a
table, and
>>> all [i]dentifiers should be declared to begin with.
>>> [...]
>> You can be as obfuscatory as your namesake ;-)
>
> I will take that as a compliment, in the spirit of the supposed
characters
> this property was attributed to. But even if that was true, so what?
You
> on the other hand are not able to quote properly as can be expected from
the
> standards-violating news server you are using, which adds to obfuscation
as
> well.
>
>> Most people (used to) call a switch-case construct a table.
>
> Of course I am not; I am talking HTML tables here, which should be
created
> dynamically (best server-side) instead of this semantically wrong tag
soup.
>
>> Subsequently it is not clear what you are talking about here.
>
> It is obvious that it is not clear *to you*. Therefore, after having
> carefully read the FAQ[1] and followed the recommendations therein, you
> should have asked one or more *specific* questions if still necessary
> then, so that I might have been be able and willing to answer them.
>
> [1] http://jibbering.com/faq/
>
>
> PointedEars
O' pointed one, my original question had already been answered quite
satisfactorily, thank you.
(and yes, it was a compliment)


|