Rick Merrill wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> tommybiegs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>> do***ent.write("<br><tt>Wed 7 May 9:25 am <\/tt>Old Movie
>>> "Dawn Patrol"<br>" );
>>>
>>> should be:
>>>
>>> do***ent.write("<br><tt>Wed 7 May 9:25 am <\/tt>Old Movie
>>> \"Dawn Patrol\"<br>" );
>> Or if you want to avoid the escape sequences, simply
>>
>> do***ent.write('<br><tt>Wed 7 May 9:25 am <\/tt>Old Movie
>> "Dawn Patrol"<br>');
>>
>> While the markup is valid, from the usability and reliability
perspective
>> the OP still has much to answer for. The whole thing should be a
table, and
>> all [i]dentifiers should be declared to begin with.
>> [...]
>
> You can be as obfuscatory as your namesake ;-)
I will take that as a compliment, in the spirit of the supposed characters
this property was attributed to. But even if that was true, so what? You
on the other hand are not able to quote properly as can be expected from
the
standards-violating news server you are using, which adds to obfuscation
as
well.
> Most people (used to) call a switch-case construct a table.
Of course I am not; I am talking HTML tables here, which should be created
dynamically (best server-side) instead of this semantically wrong tag
soup.
> Subsequently it is not clear what you are talking about here.
It is obvious that it is not clear *to you*. Therefore, after having
carefully read the FAQ[1] and followed the recommendations therein, you
should have asked one or more *specific* questions if still necessary
then, so that I might have been be able and willing to answer them.
[1] http://jibbering.com/faq/
PointedEars
--
Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on
a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web,
when you had very little chance of reading a do***ent written on another
computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee
|
