Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Java Machine > Re: JVM vs .NET
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 6 Topic 791 of 816
Post > Topic >>

Re: JVM vs .NET

by Nikolaus Wagner <spam_sorting_elf5.10.hmgut@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 12, 2007 at 11:41 PM

> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:18:50 GMT, Roedy Green wrote:
>> Both are in theory multiplatform, but JVMs have been much more widely
>> implemented.
>
> Mono, an open source implementation of .NET, runs on more platforms
> than Java judging from the long list of OS and HW platforms they list.
>
> http://www.mono-project.com
>

Well, it would be fine if Mono ran anything with a GUI :-(
(Well, a Windows.Forms GUI, not Gtk# or whatever)
Paint.net or Sharpdevelop running on Mono would be nice, but may never 
be.
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
JVM vs .NET
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2007-10-06 06:37:55 
Re: JVM vs .NET
efriedNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-10-07 04:34:25 
Re: JVM vs .NET
Roedy Green <see_websi  2007-10-11 01:19:36 
Re: JVM vs .NET
Roedy Green <see_websi  2007-10-11 01:18:50 
Re: JVM vs .NET
Gordon Beaton <n.o.t@[  2007-10-11 16:34:56 
Re: JVM vs .NET
Nikolaus Wagner <spam_  2007-10-12 23:41:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 23:14:05 CDT 2008.