Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Java Machine > Re: JVM vs .NET
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 6 Topic 791 of 833
Post > Topic >>

Re: JVM vs .NET

by Roedy Green <see_website@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 11, 2007 at 01:18 AM

On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 06:37:55 +0100, Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

>So I'm wondering what the JVM crowd have to say about the relative
>deficiencies of the JVM and .NET. Does the JVM garbage collect code
>correctly? Are there glaring flaws in the JVM?

..net's main problem is it single source. You are trusting a company
with a bad record of betraying trust.

..net's big advantage is you can also do low level unsafe code in it.
With the JVM you must revert to C++ and native code.

..net is designed for compilation.  Java is designed for interpreting
and hotspotting. Java allows elaborate dynamic run time tricks.

Both are in theory multiplatform, but JVMs have been much more widely
implemented.

..net was designed to sup****t a wide variety of languages.  Java was
designed specifically for Java, though it sup****ts many others too.
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
JVM vs .NET
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2007-10-06 06:37:55 
Re: JVM vs .NET
efriedNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-10-07 04:34:25 
Re: JVM vs .NET
Roedy Green <see_websi  2007-10-11 01:19:36 
Re: JVM vs .NET
Roedy Green <see_websi  2007-10-11 01:18:50 
Re: JVM vs .NET
Gordon Beaton <n.o.t@[  2007-10-11 16:34:56 
Re: JVM vs .NET
Nikolaus Wagner <spam_  2007-10-12 23:41:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 13:20:18 CDT 2008.