A Man Crying Alone In The Wilderness wrote:
> Master Programmer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I was thinking about learning the Java programing language. I asked a
> > friend his views and he told me not to bother - as Java is a slow
piece
> > of **** ! Is that true, is it really a goofy outdated language that
> > doesnt run quickly like other languages? (from the horses month).
> >
> > Thanks
>
>
> Astounding! /I was thinking/ Indead! How are you at learning?
>
> There is only one language AFAIK that is more mathematically pure than
> Java?
>
> Can you name that language? Or, Is this really the question you need
> answered?
>
( THE BS GOES ON AND ON AND ON AND ON ,,, LEARN TO PROGRAM BY
PROGRAMMING, EXPERIENCE GAINS KNOWLEDGE, IT REALLY DOESN"T MATTER WHAT
LANGUAGE YOU CARE FOR, PREFIX, INFIX OR POSTFIX, WHAT YOU MAY NEED IS
'HOW MANY PAGES OF CODE CAN I SHOW FOR MYSELF?' ONE HUNDRED, TWO
HUNDRED, FIVE HUNDRED PAGES OF NEW CODE PER MONTH, ... TENS OF
THOUSANDS OF PAGES OF CODE, BY THEN YOU WILL KNOW! OR, WILL YOU SIMPLY
BELIEVE ME? VLIW SMP MPP FORTH IS 'THE WAY' OF ANY DIRECTION OF
DIMENSION OF TRUTH, FOR MOST PROBLEMS, in theory, REGARDS MAW)
> The problem is rooted within the massive propoganda from companies
> similar as <SNIP> that popularize a misconception that register based
> architectures are faster than a stack ( of registers).
>
> Maybe or maybe not, the answer you seek is ... Hmm, I'm not sure.
|
