On May 1, 2:01 am, Andrew Thompson <andrewtho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 1, 2:48 pm, Knute Johnson <nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 1, 8:10 am, hust6 <mhu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> ...relies on Java 1.4.2, but some of the customers have
> > >> 1.3.
> ..
> > And why anybody is using 1.3 at this stage I don't know.
>
> Our best strategy at this stage, as far
> as providing best service to our end
> users who have Java 1.3, would be help
> them upgrade to a more recent version.
>
> The deployJava.js* does just that (from
> a web page), as best as Sun can engineer
> it and provide feedback to the end user
> (e.g. not all machines can be upgraded).
>
> * See..
> <https://jdk6.dev.java.net/deployment_advice.html>
> <http://java.com/js/deployJava.js>
>
> --
> Andrew T.
> PhySci.org
Thanks for all the suggestions, I appreciate it! And I agree it is
appalling that anyone is on 1.3.
Matt
|
