by GArlington <garlington@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 31, 2008 at 09:20 AM
On Mar 30, 12:41 am, GVR_Mike <mjbrue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Nevermind, I figured it out. For some reason I had a join in there. I
> wasn't using the second table but for some reason the join was
> throwing off the set part.
This is because the join is an implicit view, and by default they are
NOT updateable.
> I took out the join and it works fine. Keep
> on programming!!!
