On Feb 6, 11:06=A0am, Lew <l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
=2E..
> ...His site is pig dung, his
> practice of plagiarizing material and presenting it as original is pig
dun=
g,
> and his marketing practices are pig dung. =A0...
I object to your connection between pig dung
and this site, it is offensive.
Pig dung is useful as pond fertiliser. Please
do not disparage it by making any connection
between this useful product, and that despicable
site.
--
Andrew T.
