Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Java Advocacy > Re: Wireless po...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 10 Topic 2404 of 2478
Post > Topic >>

Re: Wireless popcorn

by Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 16, 2008 at 06:35 PM

On 2008-06-15 20:52 +0100, Roedy Green allegedly wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:18:30 +0200, Daniele Futtorovic
> <da.futt.news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
> someone who said :
> 
>> ot high enough to heat anything,
> 
> That is a very unscientific statement.
> 
> Please show your physics before you patronisingly spit at me for even
> considering the problem. Obviously, the size of the object heated is
> of considerable im****tance.  A shorted dry cell gets plenty hot. 
> 
> To pop a single kernel of corn would take considerably less than the
> amount of energy needed to convert an equal volume of water to steam.
> 
> I don't think you can't categorically dismiss the question without a
> little back of the envelope math. In any case, I get really really
> annoyed with folks who try to squash curiosity in others. There is
> nothing wrong with asking questions even when the answers (including
> the wrong answers) are "obvious" to some.
> 
> I hope you don't have any kids.

Take it easy, Reody. It didn't mean to spit at you. The example you gave
seemed absurd to me, and I might have given vent to that feeling. If
that annoyed you, I'm sorry, but that's how it is.

I won't give you any maths on this. I don't have them. Deus macchina
proposed some, I don't know what they're worth, but they seem to agree
with me. I think I only applied some common sense. Now, of course common
sense is sometimes wrong, I'd be the first to admit that. But for me and
for this issue, it's sufficient. If you're not satisfied with that --
hey, inquire and experiment to your heart's content. Neither would I
spit at you nor think lowly of you if you did.


> As a ballpark, I will guess you need to va****ise a milligram of water
> to pop a kernel.  
> 
> The latent heat of va****isation is 2260 joules per gram.
> 
> So I would need roughly 2 joules to pop one kernel.
> 
> A joule is a watt-second. 
> 
> You can get 3 watt cell phone boosters, but most cell phones are about
> 1 watt according to
> http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/cell-phone-radiation1.htm
> 
> If you put three of them together you would have available 3 watts.
> 
> Presuming all the power went into the heating the kernel, 

Note that this is a huge, and utterly unlikely assumption. Just my two
cents.

> I should be able to pop a kernel within a second.
>
> So I think an experiment is in order to see if this is a hoax, after
> you check my arithmetic of course.

Yada yada. Gomen.

-- 
DF.
to reply privately, change the top-level domain
in the FROM address from "invalid" to "net"
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Wireless popcorn
Roedy Green <see_websi  2008-06-08 02:02:34 
Re: Wireless popcorn
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-06-08 04:11:55 
Re: Wireless popcorn
Roedy Green <see_websi  2008-06-08 07:52:36 
Re: Wireless popcorn
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-06-08 14:18:30 
Re: Wireless popcorn
Roedy Green <see_websi  2008-06-15 18:52:37 
Re: Wireless popcorn
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-06-16 18:35:31 
Re: Wireless popcorn
Otis Bricker <obricker  2008-06-18 15:23:14 
Re: Wireless popcorn
The Ghost In The Machine   2008-06-18 14:16:19 
Re: Wireless popcorn
The Ghost In The Machine   2008-06-09 10:11:39 
Re: Wireless popcorn
Jerry McBride <jmcbrid  2008-06-20 21:08:37 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 1:11:59 CST 2008.