"Russell171" <RussellDTurner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:XXaHi.52974$Pd4.5558
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Pseudo Silk Kimono" <Pseudo_Silk_Kimono@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:fcf75s$rcn$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 2007-09-11, Roedy Green <see_website@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:39:22 GMT, "Russell171"
>>><RussellDTurner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone
>>> who said :
>>>
>>>> Does anyone know of
>>>>complex desktop, non-internet software, developed in java, such as
>>>>applications in engineering, accounting, science, etc. written in
Java?
>>>
>>> see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/serious.html
>>
>> Isn't Eclipse written in Java? And Netbeans?
>> --
>> PSK - RLU 452647 http://improve-usenet.org
>> Killing GG and Supernews now on Ubuntu, Vista and XP
>> http://www.grc.com/stevegibson.htm
>
> Eclipse and netbeans are developer tools, not final products.
>
>
So Word is a writers tool and not a final product?
I think you are trying to make a terrible distinction. The audience for a
product does not make it any less a product. If you want to view it as not
fitting your sleection criteria(engineering,science...) fine. But it is
definitely a product.
OB
|
