On 5 Apr, 17:19, "George N. White III" <aa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, rlaybe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Does anybody have a summary of the major differences between R and
> > idl? =A0I have been using idl for years and have never used R. =A0I
> > understand R is statistics orientated, but does it do anything that
> > idl can't or does it do it better?
>
> I use both IDL and R. =A0The biggest advantage of R in my work is that
> it provides NA values that are distinct from NaN. =A0Most operations
> have an na.rm option, e.g.
>
> mean(c(1,2,3,NA),na.rm=3DFALSE) returns NA, but
> mean(c(1,2,3,NA),na.rm=3DTRUE) returns 2
>
> I've never been a fan of overloading NaN as a missing data value:
> a) it can't be applied to integer data, b) there are times when
> you need to know the difference between a computational error
> and missing inputs. =A0I've spent way to much of my life coding tests
for
> missing value flags, so I really appreciate a language that properly
> sup****ts NA values.
>
> R has very solid plotting capabilities, but tends to bog down
> when working with images. =A0R (like Matlab, unlike IDL) tends to
> coerce everything to doubles for calculations, but (unlike Matlab and
> IDL) checks for NA add significant overhead for big calculations.
>
> R is an implementation of the S-plus language. =A0It has a large, active
> user community. =A0R is widely available and has a nice system to manage
> packages (which are generally provided as binaries on Windows, sources
> on *X).
>
> In my work I often use IDL to extract data (e.g, time-series) from
remote
> sensing images and then use R to analyse the resulting data sets.
>
> --
> George N. White III =A0<aa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Thanks very much for both responses. I have found them very useful.
Russ
|
