Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Idl-pvware > Re: Paths in th...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 16 Topic 5583 of 6457
Post > Topic >>

Re: Paths in the Workbench

by "mgalloy@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <mgalloy@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 31, 2008 at 11:44 AM

On Mar 31, 11:03=A0am, David Fanning <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I have been trying to give it the benefit of the doubt. If I turn
> every feature off (which is pretty much what I have done), then the
> Workbench is a worse editor than the one in IDL 6.4 and with a memory
> footprint 10-12 times its previous size. Please tell me there are some
> redeeming features I've overlooked here. :-(

I think my perspective might be clouded by the fact that I only use
the Workbench about half the time or so. For many small things, I just
use a regular editor (TextMate with the IDL bundle) and the command
line. I use the Workbench for debugging and when I work on larger
projects (that need more help navigating). For those situations, I
find the Workbench extremely valuable. But it's not going to replace
TextMate for all my IDL tasks anytime soon.

My top features (over the Windows DE since the Unix benefits are
greater):

1. I like that I can see the "Outline" view and not have to use a
droplist to see the routines in the current file. Together with the
"Project Explorer" view, it helps orient me. I use the Workbench
occasionally just to navigate through a project better.

2. Clicking on a routine name like a hyperlink to take you to the
definition of the routine. Just hold down the control key (command on
Mac) and click on a routine call.

3. Ability to add third party plugins. ITT VIS can't possibly come up
with all the different features that IDL users want (nor would it be
usable with all those features). This was I can add  things that are
very useful for *me* (Subversion integration, C/C++ modes, etc.).

4. I like the Debug perspective. Much of my use of the workbench is
debugging. I'm not sure it has a clear advantage over the old Windows
DE, but I like my layout better and there are several small features
that are useful. (Please add back conditional breakpoints, though.)

My major complaint is the help system. The help is much slower and
doesn't have tabs. I normally keep open the IDL 6.4 help (a silver
lining that nothing changed?). This isn't too bad for me anyway since
I use the command line a lot too.

Mike
--
www.michaelgalloy.com
Tech-X Cor****ation
Software Developer II
 




 16 Posts in Topic:
Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <news@[E  2008-03-31 10:17:07 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
"mgalloy@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 09:22:44 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <david@[  2008-03-31 10:03:25 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <david@[  2008-03-31 10:20:03 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
Paul van Delst <Paul.v  2008-03-31 14:18:17 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <david@[  2008-03-31 11:25:33 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
"mgalloy@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 11:44:21 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <david@[  2008-03-31 13:59:09 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
Vince Hradil <hradilv@  2008-03-31 14:43:40 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <david@[  2008-03-31 14:51:43 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
Vince Hradil <hradilv@  2008-03-31 15:11:19 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <news@[E  2008-03-31 17:19:33 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
"mgalloy@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 08:48:09 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <news@[E  2008-04-01 11:48:16 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
"Kenneth P. Bowman&q  2008-03-31 20:48:53 
Re: Paths in the Workbench
David Fanning <news@[E  2008-03-31 21:49:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 20:45:44 CST 2008.