Re: IDL 6.3 read_binary ??

kerninger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
> I just want to say that the problem is really due to the system I try
> to use this code. An other system of the same Computing Center is able
> to compile and run the code.
> So, thank you very much for your contribution.
> Now we can close this discussion ;)
> 
> kerninger

Surely this was a path problem?  You would get a syntax error if
READ_BINARY was missing from your path, so IDL would try to interpret
it as an array instead of a function.

Craig