Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Idl-pvware > Re: On errors c...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 7 Topic 5508 of 6454
Post > Topic >>

Re: On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines

by Anthony <anthonysmith80@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 6, 2008 at 12:51 AM

On Mar 6, 3:08 am, Gernot Hassenpflug <ger...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm using IDL 6.1, as well as Maple 11, Mathematica 6.0, Matlab 7.5
> and the statistical language R. My goal is to calculate the covariance
> matrix of parameters of a second order polynomial curve fit. To
> clarify: I refer to this as linear fitting, since the parameters are
> linear; however, many books, papers and routines refer to this as
> non-linear fitting.
>
> Matlab and Mathematica do not have built-in functions to do this
> (Mathematica has an add-on module which my institute has not bought)
> so I am comparing the parameter covariance matrix from IDL, Maple, R
> and my own programmed output learned from section 15.4 of Numerical
> Recipes, 2nd edition, and a paper by Keith Burrell in the American
> Journal of Physics Vol. 58, No. 2, pp 160--164 (1990) titled "Error
> analysis for parameters determined in nonlinear least-square fits",
> both describing the same method which uses the variances of the
> dependent data combined with the derivatives of the fitting function
> wrt the fitted parameters; i.e., the dependent data values themselves
> are not used, apparently.
>
> I find that in IDL the routines POLY_FIT, LMFIT and CURVEFIT can all
> calculate the parameter covariance matrix and it is do***ented that
> LMFIT uses the method of Burrell and Numerical Recipes. I cannot tell
> what method the other two routines use.
>
> Maple seems to use a different method apparently described on pp
> 197--198 of David M. Himmelblau's 1970 book titled "Process Analysis
> by Statistical Methods", which I have ordered used but not yet
> received.
>
> I am hoping that contributors to this list could give their comments
> and opinions on what method of parameter variance and covariance is
> most sound, and which routines are therefore preferred for a
> polynomial fitting case (possibly over-determined).
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>      Gernot Hassenpflug
> --
> BOFH excuse #72:
>
> Satan did it

Hi Gernot,

It's worth looking into MPFIT ("Robust non-linear least squares curve
fitting"):

http://cow.physics.wisc.edu/~craigm/idl/fitting.html

Cheers,
Anthony
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines
Gernot Hassenpflug <ge  2008-03-06 12:08:49 
Re: On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines
Anthony <anthonysmith8  2008-03-06 00:51:40 
Re: On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines
Gernot Hassenpflug <ge  2008-03-07 11:25:49 
Re: On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines
Craig Markwardt <craig  2008-03-06 22:53:16 
Re: On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines
Gernot Hassenpflug <ge  2008-03-07 14:08:42 
Re: On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines
Craig Markwardt <craig  2008-03-08 13:27:16 
Re: On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines
Gernot Hassenpflug <ge  2008-03-11 18:35:57 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 14:01:20 CST 2008.