Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Icon > Re: Unicon win3...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 138 of 196
Post > Topic >>

Re: Unicon win32 binaries

by "ernobe" <ernobe@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 23, 2007 at 09:41 AM

On Jan 5, 1:43 pm, "Edward Feustel" <efeus...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> My biggest problem is the semantics of the language(s). If something
fails
> in B,
> A := B may not change the value of A. Also it takes a while to get used
to
> the idea
> that true and fail may "be attached" to values and that they and not
values
> such as 0
> cause various branches of if and while and for to be taken.
>

The best way to get used to that is to realize that the syntax is the
best indicator of the semantics in Icon.   In your example B cannot
fail, because it is an identifier and will return the null value if
nothing has been assigned to it, which then gets assigned to A.  B()
can also return the null value, or it can fail, but that is because it
is not an identifier, it is a procedure.
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Unicon win32 binaries
Merrilee Larson <merri  2007-01-05 13:42:54 
Re: Unicon win32 binaries
"Edward Feustel"  2007-01-05 14:43:52 
Re: Unicon win32 binaries
"ernobe" <er  2007-01-23 09:41:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 8:42:01 CDT 2008.