Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Icon > Re: Unicon win3...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 138 of 189
Post > Topic >>

Re: Unicon win32 binaries

by "Edward Feustel" <efeustel@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 5, 2007 at 02:43 PM

"Merrilee Larson" <merrile@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:yBsnh.113227$YV4.85090@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi....
>
> Are the win32 binaries considered stable? I would be installing on an
> winXP box. Eventually XUbuntu will be *the* platform though - so
> compiling from source wont be a PITA. (IMHO)
> -- 
> duke |   A: Yes.                                 |
>    |   >Q: Are you sure?                         |
>     |   >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.  |
>     |   >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?                 |
The win32 binaries seem to have been working well for me for over a year.
The IDE is somewhat restricted -- not all commands seem to be implemented,
but there is enough there to do simple experimental builds and tests. The 
libraries
are a great help!

My biggest problem is the semantics of the language(s). If something fails

in B,
A := B may not change the value of A. Also it takes a while to get used to

the idea
that true and fail may "be attached" to values and that they and not
values 
such as 0
cause various branches of if and while and for to be taken.

Ed
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Unicon win32 binaries
Merrilee Larson <merri  2007-01-05 13:42:54 
Re: Unicon win32 binaries
"Edward Feustel"  2007-01-05 14:43:52 
Re: Unicon win32 binaries
"ernobe" <er  2007-01-23 09:41:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 18 20:41:34 CDT 2008.