Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Icon > Re: Unicon--dea...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 110 of 189
Post > Topic >>

Re: Unicon--dead or alive?

by BH <hrvoje.blazevic@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 21, 2006 at 11:38 AM

Clinton Jeffery wrote:
> I generally do not read or post to the Icon newsgroup or mailing list
> as I do not want to bother those Icon enthusiasts who have no use
> for Unicon's objects or improved I/O facilities.  The right place to
> ask questions like this, or get answers, is the unicon-group mailing
> list on Source Forge.
> 

Thanks for the answer. Anyway, I can't see that Icon enthusiasts would be
bothered (that would describe me as well, some 13 years ago). The volume
of
traffic on Icon group is *very* low--even lower than comp.lang.logo (which
*is* low). Likewise, from my experience with c.l.lisp, and c.l.scheme,
crossposting is considered acceptable.

-- Hrvoje
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Unicon--dead or alive?
BH <hrvoje.blazevic@[E  2006-02-20 11:43:33 
Re: Unicon--dead or alive?
Clinton Jeffery <jeffe  2006-02-21 03:07:41 
Re: Unicon--dead or alive?
BH <hrvoje.blazevic@[E  2006-02-21 11:38:30 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 4:15:09 CDT 2008.