"Bill Spight" <bspight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:42CEBD16.4BC27CC4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dear Ed,
>
>> You might want to switch to Unicon. It has graphics libraries, database
>> libraries, an IDE (still under development), and network libraries.
Seems
>> as if
>> it is more suited to Windows development.
>>
>> See Sourceforge for downloads of programs, do***entation, etc. There is
a
>> Unicon mailing list.
>> I suspect that you would get help quickly using it.
>>
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. :-)
>
> BTW, do you know if Unicon takes a performance hit in relation to Icon?
> I like OOP, but in my limited experience it seems to consume both space
> and time.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Bill
>
Bill,
I switched over some time ago when Windows Icon was not "moving along".
I use the Icon compatible syntax so far and my applications work, but I
can't compare times.
Why not ask the question to Clint Jeffrey, one of the main implementers?
Ask on the implementers
list on Sourceforge.
Ed
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
