Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Functional > adding type inf...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 2837 of 2841
Post > Topic >>

adding type inference post-facto?

by raould <raould@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 02:25 PM

anybody have a feel of how hard it is generally hand-wavingly speaking
to add type inference to a language (i have in mind an oo/functional
one, actually, probably not just functional) later? as in, i'm not
smart enough to do the type inference implementation (which probably
tells you i shouldn't be thinking of making a language in the first
place, but i'm ignoring that during this fantasy thinking stage) but
don't want to create something which utterly precludes it, because i
really value it. doesn't have to be HM, could be flow based a la
Scala.

i do believe that overall creating a language is bloody hard, to
balance all the things you want to accomplish. so i don't expect i'd
really get anywhere, but on the other hand day in day out i'm always
frustrated by every other language on earth ;-)




 2 Posts in Topic:
adding type inference post-facto?
raould <raould@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 14:25:16 
Re: adding type inference post-facto?
Jon Harrop <jon@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 18:25:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon May 12 2:48:49 CDT 2008.