Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Functional > Re: the necessi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 33 Topic 2757 of 2912
 Post > Topic >>

Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?

by "David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus)" <dformosa@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 10, 2008 at 11:23 AM

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:26:42 +0000, Jon Harrop <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote: 

[...]

> Mathematica does sup****t recursion but its Compile function (that
compiles
> to an interpreted bytecode) does not sup****t recursive anonymous
functions.
>
> Actually, I can't think of any other languages that sup****t recursive
> anonymous functions anyway: none of Lisp, Scheme, SML, OCaml, F# and
> Haskell do AFAIK.

You can do anonymous recusion in Lisp and Scheme via letrec.  Any
language where you can implement the Y-combinator you can get
anonymous recursion.




 33 Posts in Topic:
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-04 10:37:38 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-06 17:14:18 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 "John Thingstad"  2008-02-06 19:42:31 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-07 00:07:54 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-09 15:14:09 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-10 10:27:07 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-15 23:12:34 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-16 21:02:03 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-09 15:21:54 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 "John Thingstad"  2008-02-10 01:48:39 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 23:29:33 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-12 16:37:06 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-07 22:25:25 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-08 21:06:41 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-09 15:24:21 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-10 10:26:42 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 "David Formosa (aka   2008-02-10 11:23:32 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 George Neuner <gneuner  2008-02-10 23:54:27 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-11 02:56:22 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 George Neuner <gneuner  2008-02-11 20:53:12 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-12 02:17:33 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 "John Thingstad"  2008-02-12 04:48:24 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-12 16:35:17 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 George Neuner <gneuner  2008-02-12 15:18:23 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-12 20:16:55 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-12 05:34:01 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-11 10:41:47 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Barb Knox <see@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 09:52:26 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-15 23:17:07 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Jon Harrop <usenet@[EM  2008-02-16 20:46:11 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 Pascal Bourguignon <pj  2008-02-08 22:33:21 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-20 15:25:52 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
 rem642b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-20 17:12:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 17:03:28 CDT 2008.