Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Functional > Re: the necessi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 2730 of 3037
Post > Topic >>

Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?

by Pascal Costanza <pc@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 22, 2008 at 12:58 PM

Xah Lee wrote:

> In Mathematica, there's no such steps of concept. The list
> “List[1,2,3]” is just a list as is. There is no such
intermediate
> concept of objects. Everything in Mathematica is just a
“expression”,
> meaning the texual code you type.

No, "List[1,2,3]" is just a couple of black pixels on the screen.


Pascal

-- 
1st European Lisp Symposium (ELS'08)
http://prog.vub.ac.be/~pcostanza/els08/

My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Do***ent Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
Pascal Costanza <pc@[E  2008-01-22 12:58:00 
Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
Patrick May <pjm@[EMAI  2008-01-22 08:05:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 21:17:02 CDT 2008.