Re: Type extension and renamed parent type

On Jul 28, 7:05 am, nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Richard Maine) wrote:
> Ron Ford <r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > I'm curious what motivates the question.
>
> From reading the OP's replies in the thread, it seems fairly evident to
> me that a motivation of the question was to make the compiler comply
> with the standard... which seems a good goal in my view.
>

Indeed!  Last night, I submitted a patch to the gfortran list for
derived type extension that complies with our interpretation of the
standard.  Your confirmation of our understanding encouraged us to
ignore the other products.

The implementation of derived type extension is the first step towards
cl***** and OOP.

Thanks

Paul